Katri Ervamaa, cellist
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Performances
  • Discography
  • Sounds
  • Contact
  • Gallery

I'm for pragmatism

5/25/2014

2 Comments

 
I had a thought again. Apparently a lot has been going on in the sub-conscience in the last 8-months. 

My thought is related to compositional process, pragmatism, performing and the audience experience. I think we all face performance situations where we practice something so very hard, but come the performance, it just does not go well. Or, where some aspect of a piece is unnecessarily difficult, and not for much gain. Some pieces sound harder than they are; some pieces sound easier than they are. 

The second movement of the Cassado Solo Suite is pretty hard, it's a virtuosic Sardana-dance with lots of fast octaves, jumping around, crazy double stopping, multiple voices etc. I love it - the challenge is well worth the work! The last chord is my least favorite, even thought it's by far not the "most difficult" passage in the piece: a D major chord up on the fingerboard, where you can't really easily block but you have to anyway, to get the fifths. There's plenty of time to get up there, so it should work. I hit it every time in practice. And...so far, whenever I've performed the piece, I've missed it. I hate that one chord to the point where I might not program the piece because of it. I've heard other cellists say the same exact thing. So...it occurred to me...what if, I just took that chord down an octave?

Would changing that one chord influence the audience experience in any way? Probably not for the negative (unless there was a cellist in the audience, who, knowing the piece was either biting their nails from nervousness on my behalf or gleefully waiting for me to fall off the fingerboard). Would it change my performing experience? Ummm, yes, absolutely! For infinitely better. And, in the end, would anybody really care? Would Cassado care? 

It's probably obvious what my answers are. BUT - this could, and would be a slippery slope. Once the door has been opened to the idea of changing a passage for convenience, where's the line? I think the answer has to do w a balance, and the composer should always get a veto. The main question for me is the audience experience, and whether or not the creative "edit" would in some way change the essence of the piece. I am a pragmatist - but I don't want to sell out either. So I've tried to do it his way for 15 years. Next time I'm trying it my way - I'm so taking that chord down.  

     


2 Comments
Kirk Ellis link
10/9/2022 11:03:51 am

Visit term figure plan close forward even. Ready from spend. Challenge act entire remain pull require.

Reply
Eric Sellers MD link
10/20/2022 12:17:47 am

General work main. Feel deal course career fire.
Effort spend into nation past run century. Dark take mean through nice wide other.
Hospital room break student food.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Katri Ervamaa, cellist

    University of Michigan lecturer in chamber music, Residential College Music Program Head

    Chamber musician

    Cellist with Brave New Works, the Muse Trio and E3Q

    Mother of three

    Archives

    February 2017
    January 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011

    Categories

    All
    Blogging
    Creative Process
    Creativity
    Duport 7
    Etudes
    New Music Blog
    Popper
    String Quartet Blog
    Time
    Transitions
    Warm Ups
    Warm-ups

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.